Close
 
 

Pathways for Review - Post-Tenure Review

Post-Tenure Review [HOP 6.2.9] Due Dates

  1. Department Committee Established December 2 - 6, 2013
  2. Candidate submits Post-Tenure folder January 10, 2014
  3. Department Committee Recommendations1 January 13 - 24, 2014
  4. Candidate Opportunity to Respond January January 27 - 31, 2014
  5. Department Chair Recommendations 1 February 3 - 14, 2014
  6. Candidate Opportunity to Respond February 17 - 21, 2014
  7. College Dean Recommendations 1 February 24 - March 7, 2014
  8. Candidate Opportunity to Respond March 10 - 14, 2014
  9. College Committee Evaluarion (if applicable)1 March 17 - 28, 2014
  10. Candidate Opportunity to Respond March 31 - April 4, 2014
  11. Recommendations due to Provost April 7, 2014
  12. Provost Reviews/Recommendations April 7 - 25, 2014
  13. Candidate Opportunity to Respond April 28 - May 2, 2014
  14. University Tenure Committee (if requested)May 5 - 9, 2014
  15. President Reviews/Recommendations (if applicable) May 12 - 23, 2014
  16. Candidate Opportunity to Respond May 27 - 30, 2014
  17. President's Final Recommendation (if applicable)#

Other related deadlines

Provost Office will provide list to Faculty members due for post-tenure review to Dean for following academic year

  • July 1, 2014

 

* HOP 6.2.9.F.1 "If the post tenure review cycle coincides with the faculty member's application for promotion, then the latter will be considered as a concurrent application for post tenure review."

1 HOP 6.2.9.F.5 "If the dean or the department committee concludes that there are areas of serious concern [candidate receiving does not meet expectations] or that the faculty member is deficient [candidate receiving unsatisfactory], then a college peer review committee will be convened. This committee will be the standing College Tenure Committee.

 HOP 6.2.9.F.7 "If either the President or the faculty member requests, the University Tenure Committee will be convened to review the recommendation of the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs and advise the President."

# HOP 6.2.9.F.8 "If the President concludes the faculty member is so deficient in meeting his or her comprehensive academic responsibilities as to warrant a recommendation of termination, a faculty tribunal will be convened to review the President's recommendation. The tribunal shall be appointed in accordance with UTPA policies and Regents' Rules."